بررسی سرایت‌پذیری ریسک نکول بین شرکت‌های هلدینگ و شرکت‌های فرعی آنها (مورد مطالعه: شرکت گسترش سرمایه‌گذاری ایران خودرو)

نوع مقاله : علمی - پژوهشی

نویسندگان

1 استادیار، گروه مالی و بانکداری، دانشگاه علامه‌طباطبائی، تهران، ایران

2 دانشجوی دکتری مدیریت مالی، دانشگاه علامه طباطبائی، تهران، ایران

چکیده

بررسی سرایت‌پذیری ریسک نکول در میان نهادهای مالی و ارتباط آنها با یکدیگر،‌ از اهمیت زیادی در انتخاب سبد سهام، مدیریت ریسک و رتبه اعتباری نهادها برخوردار است.‌ هدف این پژوهش، بررسی اثر سرایت­پذیری احتمال نکول بین شرکت­های هلدینگ و شرکت‌های فرعی آنها در بازار سرمایه کشور می‌باشد. برای این منظور در مرحله اول، احتمال نکول با استفاده از مدل قیمت‌گذاری اختیار معامله بلک-شولز-مرتون (BSM) برای هلدینگ گسترش سرمایه­گذاری ایران خودرو و سه شرکت فرعی آن محاسبه و سپس سرایت‌پذیری احتمال نکول با استفاده از مدل­های گارچ چندمتغیره (مدل BEKK) به صورت روزانه برای دوره زمانی 1390 الی 1397 مورد بررسی قرار گرفت. نتایج این پژوهش نشان داد که سرایت‌پذیری ریسک نکول از شرکت هلدینگ به شرکت‌های فرعی آن و همچنین از شرکت‌های فرعی به شرکت هلدینگ وجود دارد.

کلیدواژه‌ها


عنوان مقاله [English]

The Spillover Effects of Default Risk between Holding Companies and Their Subsidiaries (Case Study: Iran Khodro Investment Development Co.)

نویسندگان [English]

  • Mohammad Hassan Ebrahimi Sarv Oliya 1
  • Hossein Tamalloki 2
1 Assistant Prof, Department of Finance and Banking, Allameh Tabataba'i University, Tehran, Iran.
2 PhD.Candidate in Financial Management, Allameh Tabataba'i University, Tehran, Iran.
چکیده [English]

Study of spillover effects of default risk plays a very significant role in financial institutions, their relation & interaction with each other and in portfolio selection, risk management and the credit rating of such institutions as well.This research aims to study the spillover effects of default risk between holding Companies and their subsidiaries active in Iran’s capital market. For such a purpose, in the first phase, default probability was calculated for Iran Khodro Investment Development Co. and its three subsidiaries by Black-Scholes-Merton (BSM) option pricing model, then default probability spillover for the period of 2011-2018 was measured on daily basis by multivariate GARCH model (BEKK model).As concluded, there is a spillover effect of default risk from the holding companies to their subsidiaries and vice versa. 

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

  • Spillover Effects
  • Default Risk
  • Holding Companies
  • Multivariates GARCH Model
1. Bauwens L., Laurent S., & V. K. Rombouts J. (2006). Multivariate GARCH Models: a survey. Journal of Applied Econometrics, 29, 79-109.
2. Bonfim, D. (2009). Credit risk drivers: Evaluating the contribution of firm level information and of macroeconomic dynamics. Journal of Banking and Finance, 33(2), 281-299.
3. Boqiang, Lin, Presley, K.Wesseh, Jr, & Owusu Appiah, Michael (2014). Oil price fluctuation, volatility spillover and the Ghanaian equity market: Implication for portfolio management and hedging effectiveness. Energy Economics, 42, 172–182.
4. Chang, Ch. L., McAleer, M., & Tansuchat, R. (2013). Conditional correlations and volatility spillovers between crude oil and stock index returns. The North American Journal of Economics and Finance, 25, 116–138.
5. Delnavaz, Bita & fallah, mirfeiz (2019). Study of Financial Distress Spillover Effect among Automobile Supply Chain Companies Listed in the Tehran Stock Exchange. Journal of Business Management. 11(44) (in persian).
6. Do, Anh, Powella, Robert, Yonga, Jaime, & Singh, Abhay Kumar (2019). Time-varying asymmetric volatility spillover between global markets and China’s A, B and H-shares using EGARCH and DCC-EGARCH models. North American Journal of Economics and Finance, 15, 1-26.
7. Fallahi, Firouz, & Jahangiri, Khalil (2016). The Study of Financial Contagion among Stock Market, Exchange and Gold Coin in Iran. Journal of Financial Monetary Economics, 22, 10(in persian).
8. Hashemi nejad, seyyed mohammad; Ebrahimi, Seyed Babak; nejad afrasiabi, Maryam (2017). Risk Assessment and volatility Modeling; Page 144 (in persian).
9. Harris, R. (2005). Return and Volatility Spillovers between Large and Small Stocks in the UK. Journal of Business Finance & Accounting, 33, 1556-1571.
10. John Beirne, G. M.-G. (2010). Global and regional spillovers in emerging stock markets: A multivariate GARCH-in-mean analysis. Emerging Markets Review, 11, 250-260.
11. Kanda, Patrick, Burke, Michael, & Gupta, Rangan (2019). Time-varying causality between equity and currency returns in the United Kingdom: Evidence from over two centuries of data. Physica A 506, 1060–1080.
12. Keshavarz, Gholamreza, Ebrahimi, Seyed Babak, & jafar abdi; akbar (2011).  Volatility and Return Transmission among Cement Industry Stock Prices: an Application of Multivariate FIGARCH Modeling in High Frequency Financial time Series. Iranian Journal of Economic Research; 16, 47 (in persian).
13. Kishor, Nawal, & Preet Singh, Raman (2014). Stock Return Volatility Effect: Study of BRICS. Transnational Corporations Review, 6, 406-418.
14. Leunga, Henry, Schiereckb, Dirk, & Schroederc, Florian (2017). Volatility spillovers and determinants of contagion: Exchange rate and equity markets during crises. Economic Modelling.61, 169–180.
15. Liu, Tangyong, & Gong, Xu (2020). Analyzing time-varying volatility spillovers between the crude oil markets using a new method. Energy Economics 87.
16. Mohamed El Hedi Arouri, J. J. (2011). Volatility spillovers between oil prices and stock sector returns: Implications for portfolio management. Journal of International Money and Finance, 30, 187-145.
17. Nikoomaram, Hashem, Pourzamani, Zahra, & Dehghan, Abdolmajid (2015). Spillover Effect the on Contest Import & Export oriented industries. Financial knowledge of securities analysis, 8(25) (in persian).
18. Pavlovaa, Ivelina, E. de Boyrieb, Maria, M. Parhizgarim, Ali (2018). A dynamic spillover analysis of crude oil effects on the sovereign credit risk of exporting countries. The Quarterly Review of Economics and Finance 68, 10–22.
19. Ramap rasad Bha, B. N. (2008). Return, volatility spillovers and dynamic correlation in the BRIC equity markets: An analysis using a bivariate EGARCH framework. Global Finance Journal, 19, 203-218.
20. Ranjan Mishraa, Bibhuti, Pradhanb, Ashis Kumar, Tiwaric, Aviral Kumar, & Shahbazc, Muhammad (2019). The dynamic causality between gold and silver prices in India: Evidence using time-varying and non-linear approaches. Resources Policy, 62, 66–76.
21. Rui Huoa, Abdullahi D. Ahmedb (2017). Return and volatility spillovers effects: Evaluating the impact of Shanghai-Hong Kong Stock Connect. Economic Modeling, 61, 260-272.
22. Sarwar, Suleman, Tiwari, Aviral Kumar, & Tingqiu, Cao (2020). Analyzing volatility spillovers between oil market and Asian stock markets. Resources Policy, 66.
23. Sefidbakht, elaheh, & Ranjbar, Mohammad Hossein (2017). Volatility Spillover between Oil Price, Exchange Rates, Gold Price and Stock Market Indexes with Structural Breaks. Financial engineering and portfolio management, 8(33) (in persian).
24. Seyed hosseini, Seyed Mohammad, & Ebrahimi, Seyed Babak (2013). Comparing of Volatility Transmission Model with Consideration of Long Memory Effect; Case Study: Three Selected Industry Index. Financial Research Journal, 15(1) (in persian).
25. Shrimal, Kapil (2016). Volatility Spillover Effect from Foreign Stock Exchanges to National Stock Exchanges. Scholars Journal of Economics, Business and Management, (3)6. 328-339.
26. Singu, H. B. & Bansal, R. (2017). Financial distress prediction of Indian companies: Future perspectives. International Journal of Economic Research, 14(4): 173-181.
27. Warren G. Dean, R. W. (2010). Asymmetry in return and volatility spillover between equity and bond markets in Australia. Pacific-Basin Finance Journal, 18, 272-289.
28. Wang, Y. S., & Chueh, Y. L. (2013). Dynamic transmission effects between the interest rate, the US dollar, and gold and crude oil prices. Economic Modelling, 30, 792–798.
29. Zamani, Shiva, Souri, Davood, & Sanaei Alam, Mohsen (2011). A Dynamic Investigation to Indexes Spillovers in Tehran Stock Exchange Using a Multivariate Dynamic Model. Journal of Economic Research, 45(4) (in persian).