چشم انداز مدیریت مالی

چشم انداز مدیریت مالی

رابطه انتخاب ساختار سرمایه، عدم‏ تقارن اطلاعاتی و ظرفیت بدهی در شرکت‌های پذیرفته شده در بورس اوراق بهادار تهران

نوع مقاله : علمی - پژوهشی

نویسندگان
پریسا سادادت بهبهانی نیا 1
رضا اکبریان شورکایی 2
فاطمه حسین زاده 3
1 استادیار، عضو هیات علمی گروه حسابداری دانشگاه الزهراء (س)
2 دانش‏ آموخته حسابداری دانشگاه علامه طباطبایی
3 دانش آموخته حسابداری دانشگاه الزهراء(س)
چکیده
در این پژوهش پیش‌بینی‌های نظریه سلسله‌مراتب در میان شرکت‌های پذیرفته‌شده در بورس اوراق بهادار بررسی شده است. به این ترتیب که نمونه‌ای متشکل از 145 شرکت پذیرفته‌شده در «بورس اوراق بهادار تهران» طی دوره زمانی سال­های 1390 تا 1396، برای آزمون فرضیه‌ها مورداستفاده قرار گرفت. شواهد حاکی از آن است که شرکت‌های پذیرفته‌شده در بورس از نظریه سلسله‌مراتب پیروی نمی‌کنند و شرکت‌های کوچک، نسبت به شرکت‌های بزرگ، برای تأمین مالی بیشتر از انتشار سهام استفاده می‌کنند. علاوه بر این، نظریه سلسله‌مراتب در میان شرکت‌هایی که نگرانی در مورد ظرفیت بدهی ندارند بهتر عمل خواهد کرد. یافته­ها همچنین نشان می‌دهد که قدرت توضیحی نظریه سلسله‌مراتب بیشتر از نظریه توازن است؛ ولی تفاوت قابل‌توجهی وجود ندارد. درمجموع نتایج نشان می‌دهد که نظریه سلسله‌مراتب در توضیح انتخاب‌های تأمین مالی شرکت‏های نمونه ناموفق است.

عنوان مقاله English

Relationship of Capital Structure Choice, Information Asymmetry, and Debt Capacity in Tehran Stock Exchange Listed Companies

نویسندگان English

Parisa Saadat Behbahaninia 1
Reza Akbarian Shurkaei 2
Fatemeh Hosseinzadeh 3
1 Assistant Professor, Department of Accounting, Faculty of Social Sciences and Economics, Alzahra University
2 Graduated from Allameh Tabataba'i University
3 student of Alzahra University
چکیده English

Abstract
Information asymmetry costs are the most important driver for firms’ financing decisions that our understanding of this issue will lead to identifying the firms’ behavior. Hence, this study seeks to investigate the predictions of pecking order theory among companies listed in the Tehran Stock Exchange. In this research, the sample includes 141 companies listed the Tehran Stock Exchange and is during 1390 – 1394 years that is used for testing hypothesis. Evidence show that listed companies do not follow the pecking order theory, and small firms compared to large firms, use more stock issuance for financing. In addition, performing of pecking order theory among firms without debt capacity concerns is better. In addition, results show that explanatory power of pecking order theory is more than trade-off theory, but it is not remarkable. Overall, result shows that hat the pecking order theory fails to explain sample firms’ financing choices.

کلیدواژه‌ها English

Pecking order theory- Adverse selection costs- Debt capacity-Trade off theory
  1. Agca, S., & Mozumdar, A. (2004). Firm size, debt capacity, and corporate financing choices.
  2. Ansari, A., Yusefzadeh, N., Zare, Z. (2013). A review of the theories of capital structure, Studies of accounting and auditing, 7, 45-56 (In Persian).
  3. Asadi, Gh., Khoshnood, S., & Dolu, M. (2011). Review of Factors Affecting on Entities Financial Structure, Journal of Financial Management Perspective, 1(4), 9-23 (In Persian)
  4. Baghomian, R,. & Khaleghi Moghadam, H. (2007). Review on capital structure theories, Peyk noor, 5, 4, 58-82 (In Persian).
  5. Baker, M., & Wurgler, J. (2002). Market timing and capital structure. The journal of finance, 57(1), 1-32.
  6. Balasubramanian N, Black BS, Khanna V (2010). The relation between firm-level corporate governance and market value: a case study of India. Emerg Mark Rev 11(4), 319-340
  7. Bandyopadhayay, A., & Barua, N. M. (2016). Factors determining capital structure and corporate performance in India: studying the business cycle effects, Quarterly Review of Economics and Finance, 61, 160-172.
  8. Berger, P. G., Ofek, E., & Swary, I. (1996). Investor valuation of the abandonment option. Journal of financial economics, 42(2), 257-287.
  9. Bhama, V., Jain, P. K., & Yadav, S. S. (2016). Testing the pecking order theory of deficit and surplus firms: Indian evidence. International Journal of Managerial Finance, 12(3), 335-350.
  10. Booth, L., Aivazian, V., Demirguc‐Kunt, A., & Maksimovic, V. (2001). Capital structures in developing countries. The journal of finance, 56(1), 87-130.
  11. Chen, J. J. (2004). Determinants of capital structure of Chinese-listed companies. Journal of Business research, 57(12), 1341-1351.
  12. Chirinko, R. S., & Singha, A. R. (2000). Testing static tradeoff against pecking order models of capital structure: a critical comment. Journal of financial economics, 58(3), 417-425.
  13. Chong, T. T. L., Law, D. T. Y., & Yao, F. (2016). The Debt-Equity Choice of Japanese Firms. International Journal of Business and Society, 17(2), 167.
  14. Fischer, E. O., Heinkel, R., & Zechner, J. (1989). Dynamic capital structure choice: Theory and tests. The Journal of Finance, 44(1), 19-40.
  15. Frank, M. Z., & Goyal, V. K. (2003). Testing the pecking order theory of capital structure. Journal of financial economics, 67(2), 217-248.
  16. Golarzi, Gh., Sarbazi Azad., S. (2016). The relationship between Information asymmetry and level of cash holding of listed companies in Tehran Stock Exchange, Financial Management Perspective, 6(15), 43-59 (In Persian).
  17. Harris, M., & Raviv, A. (1991). The theory of capital structure. The Journal of Finance, 46(1), 297-355.
  18. Hashemi, S.A., & Keshavarz Mehr, D. (2015). Investigating the asymmetry of the capital adjustment speed: A dynamic upper model. Financial Engineering and Securities Management, 6(23), 59-78 (In Persian).
  19. Heidari, A., & Yosufzade, N. (2012). Determinants of Financial Structure of Iranian Companies Listed in Tehran Stock Exchange: A Structural Equation Modeling Approach. Economics Research, 12(45), 75-98 (In Persian).
  20. Huang, G. (2006). The determinants of capital structure: Evidence from China. China economic review, 17(1), 14-36.
  21. Huang, R., & Ritter, J. R. (2009). Testing theories of capital structure and estimating the speed of adjustment. Journal of Financial and Quantitative analysis, 44(02), 237-271.
  22. Izadi’nia, N., & Dastjerdi Rahimi, M. (2009). The effect of capital structure on the rate of return on equity and earnings per share, Accounting Research, 3, 136-16 (In Persian).
  23. Jensen, M. C. (1986). Agency costs of free cash flow, corporate finance, and takeovers. The American economic review, 76(2), 323-329.
  24. Kaplan, S. N., & Zingales, L. (1997). Do investment-cash flow sensitivities provide useful measures of financing constraints? The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 112(1), 169-215.
  25. Kashanipour, M., & Momeni Yansari, A. (2012). "Investigating the effects of information asymmetry on capital structure of listed companies in Tehran Stock Exchange". Journal of Accounting & Auditing Research, 4(11), 4-19 (In Persian).
  26. Khanna, T., & Palepu, K. (2013). Winning in emerging markets: A road map for strategy and execution. Harvard Business Press.
  27. Kimiagari, A., & Einali, S. (2009). A Comprehensive Trend of Capital Structure Case Study of Companies Listed in TSE. Quarterly Journal of Financial Research, 9 (4), 91-108 (In Persian).
  28. Komera, S & Lukoso, J. (2015). Capital structure choice, information asymmetry, and debt capacity: evidence from India. Journal of Economics and Finance, 39(4), 807-823.
  29. Kordestani, G., & Fadaee Koloozi, E. (2012). The Relationship between Information Asymmetry and Capital structure on The Tehran Stock Exchange. Journal of Accounting Research, 2(4), 77-100. doi: 10.22051/ijar.2012.3837 (In Persian).
  30. Kordestani, O., & Najafi, M. (2009), Determinants of Debt Ratio: the Static Trade-off and Pecking Order Theories. Quarterly Journal of Financial Research, 9 (4), 73-90 (In Persian).
  31. Kraus, A., & Litzenberger, R. H. (1973). A state‐preference model of optimal financial leverage. The journal of finance, 28(4), 911-922.
  32. Lemmon, M. L., & Zender, J. F. (2010). Debt capacity and tests of capital structure theories.
  33. Masoumi, J., Najari, M., Ghasemi, Gh., & Atashi, H. (2013). Effects of firms size, collateral assets, profitability, growth opportunities and company life on their capital structure (comparison of hierarchy theory and static balance theory). The second National Conference on Developing Solutions for Management, Accounting, and Industrial Engineering in Organizations (In Persian).
  34. Momeni Taheri, Y., & Sadeghi, S. (2017). Relationship between Capital Structure and Financial Performance by Concentrating on Business Cycles: An analysis of Debt/Stock-nexus Firms. Economic Modeling, 11(38), 137-156 (In Persian).
  35. Myers, S. C. (1984). The capital structure puzzle. The journal of finance, 39(3), 574-592.
  36. Myers, S. C., & Majluf, N. S. (1984). Corporate financing and investment decisions when firms have information that investors do not have. Journal of financial economics, 13(2), 187-221.
  37. Nabiei Boroujeni, H., & Noroozi, M. (2015). The Determinant Factors of Capital Structure of Companies Listed in Tehran Stock Exchange Using Hierarchical Theory. Journal of Accounting Research, 5(1), 65-84. doi: 10.22051/ijar.2015.2137 (In Persian).
  38. Nazemi Ardakani, M., & Zare, A. H. (2016). Investing the Effect of Corporate Governance on Capital Structure Adjustment Speed using Generalized Method of Moments, Financial Management Perspective, 6(15), 43-59 (In Persian).
  39. Qureshi, M. A., Sheikh, N. A., & Khan, A. A. (2015). A revisit of pecking order theory versus trade-off theory: Evidence from Pakistan. Pakistan Journal of Commerce and Social Sciences, 9(2), 344-355.
  40. Rajan, R. G., & Zingales, L. (1995). What do we know about capital structure? Some evidence from international data. The journal of Finance, 50(5), 1421-1460.
  41. SadeghiSharif, J., & Khazaei, S. (2016). The Effect of Uncertainty of Macroeconomic and Company-Specific on Leverage of Listed Companies in Tehran Stock Exchange: The Direct and Indirect Effects. Quarterly Journal of Fiscal and Economic Policies, 3. 4(13), 27-54 URL: http://qjfep.ir/article-1-313-fa.html (In Persian).
  42. Setayesh, M., & Jamalian Pour, M. (2009). Effects of Capital Structure and Changes in It on Manufacturing Products. Empirical Studies in Financial Accounting, 7(25), 127-146 (In Persian).
  43. Shyam-Sunder, L., & Myers, S. C. (1999). Testing static tradeoff against pecking order models of capital structure. Journal of financial economics, 51(2), 219-244.
  44. Stiglitz, J. E. (1989). Imperfect information in the product market. Handbook of industrial organization, 1, 769-847.
  45. Tavakolnia, E., Fazlollah Poor Nagharchi, M., & Hatam, J. (2014). Financial Leverage and its Relationship with Financial Strength, Growth and Capital Intensity in Companies Listed on Tehran Stock Exchange (Linear & Curvilinear Relationships). Financial Management Strategy, 2(2), 79-101. doi: 10.22051/jfm.2015.984 (In Persian).
  46. Zou, H., & Xiao, J. Z. (2006). The financing behaviour of listed Chinese firms. The British Accounting Review, 38(3), 239-258.