استراتژی معاملات بازخورد و رفتار سرمایه‌گذاران در صندوق‌های قابل معامله در ایران

نوع مقاله : علمی - پژوهشی

نویسندگان

1 دانشجوی دکتری اقتصاد، واحد قزوین، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی، قزوین، ایران.

2 استادیار، گروه اقتصاد، واحد قزوین، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی، قزوین، ایران

چکیده

صندوق‌های قابل معامله در بورس دارای ویژگی‌های بسیار زیادی مانند هزینه کم، کارایی مالیاتی، نقدینگی و ویژگی‌هایی مانند سهام هستند که آن را بسیار جذاب می‌کند. به همین دلیل، محبوب‌ترین نوع مقصد سرمایه‌گذاری هستند. به دلیل سهولت و هزینه پایین معامله، این صندوق‌ها ممکن است برای معامله‌گرانی که تمایل بیشتری به پیگیری روندها دارند، جذابیت بیشتری داشته باشد. تحقیقات در مورد رفتار سرمایه‌گذاران این صندوق‌ها نشان داده است که آن‌ها مستعد دنبال کردن معاملات بازخورد هستند. هدف از این مقاله، بررسی معاملات بازخورد در صندوق‌های قابل معامله سهام در بازار سرمایه ایران برای اولین بار می‌باشد. به این منظور، از داده‌های روزانه هفت صندوق قابل معامله سهام طی دوره زمانی 15/07/1392 الی 29/12/1401 و مدل معاملات بازخورد سنتانا-وادوانی (1992) استفاده شده است. نتایج نشان داد که علی‌رغم وجود بازار با هم‌پوشانی کامل برای معاملات دارایی پایه، این صندوق‌ها در بیشتر روزهای معاملاتی پایین‌تر از ارزش خالص دارایی خود معامله می‌شوند. نتایج حاصل از برآورد مدل معاملات بازخورد نشان داد که هیچ‌گونه شواهدی مبنی بر وجود معاملات بازخورد در این صندوق‌ها وجود ندارد و معامله‌گران توجهی به بازدهی گذشته آن‌ها ندارند. همچنین بازار این صندوق‌ها از کارایی برخوردار می‌باشد که این موضوع را می‌توان به مدیریت حرفه‌ای این صندوق‌ها نسبت داد.

کلیدواژه‌ها


عنوان مقاله [English]

Feedback Trading Strategy and Investors Behavior in Exchange Traded Fund in Iran

نویسندگان [English]

  • Mahdi Shaerattar 1
  • Akbar Mirzapour Babajan 2
1 * Ph.D. Candidate in Economics, Qazvin Branch, Islamic Azad University, Qazvin, Iran
2 Assistant Prof., Department of Economics, Qazvin Branch, Islamic Azad University, Qazvin, Iran.
چکیده [English]

Exchange Traded Funds (ETFs) have so many features like low cost, tax efficiency, liquidity and stock like attributes which make it most attractive. Because of this, ETFs are the most popular type of investment destination. Intuitively, because of their ease and low cost of trading, ETFs may be appealing to individual (unsophisticated, uninformed) investors who are more likely to chase trends, raising a concern over the impact of their introduction on the overall market efficiency. The purpose of this article is to examine the strategy of feedback trading and investors’ behavior ETF in the capital market of Iran for the first time. For this purpose, the daily data of seven ETFs 2013/10/07-2023/03/20 and Santana-Wadvani model (1992) have been used. The results showed that despite the existence of a fully overlapping market for underlying asset transactions, these ETFs are traded below their net asset value on most trading days. The results of the estimation of the feedback trading model showed that there is no evidence of the existence of feedback trading in ETFs and traders do not pay attention to their past performance. The market of these ETFs is efficient, which can be attributed to the professional management of these ETFs

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

  • Feedback trading
  • Price deviation
  • Exchange traded funds
  • Market efficiency
  • Investors behavior
  1. Alex, K. & Markus, R. (2019). Feedback trading: Strategies during day and night with global interconnectedness. Research in International Business and Finance, 48: 438-463.
  2. Andrikopoulos, P. Cui, Y. Gad, S. & Kallinterakis, V. (2020). Feedback trading and the ramadan effect in frontier markets. Research in International Business and Finance, 51: 101085.
  3. Antoniou, A. Koutmos, G. and Pericli, A. (2005). Index futures and positive feedback trading: Evidence from major stock exchanges. Journal of Empirical Finance, 12, 219-238.
  4. Barberis, N. Shleifer, A. Vishny, R. (1998). A Model of Investor Sentiment. Journal of Financial Economics, 49, 307-343.
  5. Charteris, A. & Kallinterakis, V. (2021). Feedback trading in retail-dominated assets: Evidence from the gold bullion coin market. International Review of Financial Analysis, 75: 101727.
  6. Charteris, A. & Musadziruma, A. (2017). Feedback trading in stock index futures: Evidence from South Africa. Research in International Business and Finance, 42, 1289–1297.
  7. Charteris, A. Rupande, L. (2017). Feedback trading on the JSE. Investment Analysts Journal, 46(3), 235-248.
  8. Chau, F. Deesomsak, R. (2015). Business cycle variation in positive feedback trading: Evidence from the G-7 economies. Journal of International Financial Markets, Institutions and Money, 35, 147–159.
  9. Chau, F. Deesomsak, R. Lau, M. (2011). Investor sentiment and feedback trading: Evidence from the exchange traded funds market. International Review of Financial Analysis, 20, 292–305.
  10. Cutler, D. Poterba, J. Summers, L. (1990). Speculative dynamics and the role of feedback traders. American Economic Review. AEA Proceedings, 63–68.
  11. Dacosta Neto, A. Klotzle, M. & Pinto, A. (2019). Investor behavior in ETF markets: A comparative study between the US and emerging markets. International Journal of Emerging Markets, 14(5): 944–966.
  12. Dagama Silva, P. Neto, A. Kelotzle, M. & Pinto, A. (2019). Does the cryptocurrency market exhibits feedback trading? Economics Bulletin, 39(4): 2830-2838
  13. Dai, Z. & Yang, D. (2018). Positive feedback trading and investor sentiment. Emerging Markets Finance and Trade, 54(10), 2400-2408.
  14. De Long, J. B., Shleifer, A. Summers, L. Waldmann, R. (1990). Positive feedback investment strategies and destabilizing rational speculation. Journal of Finance, 45(2), 379–395.
  15. Deville, L. (2008). Exchange Traded Funds: History, Trading, and Research. Handbook of Financial Engineering. 67-97.
  16. Economou, F., Gavriilidis, K., Gebka, B., & Kallinterakis, V. (2022). Feedback trading: a review of theory and empirical evidence. Review of Behavioral Finance, 15(4), 429-476.
  17. Fama, E. (1970). Efficient capital markets: A review of theory and empirical work. Journal of Finance, 25(2), 383–417.
  18. Farmer, J. (2002). Market Force, Ecology and Evolution. Industrial and Corporate Change, Vol. 11, No.5, 895-953.
  19. Financial information processing of Iran. (2023). http:// www.fipiran.com
  20. Gallagher, D. Segara R. (2005). The performance and trading characteristics of exchange traded funds. University of New South Wales, Working Paper.
  21. Glosten, L. R., Jagannathan, R., & Runkle, D. E. (1993). On the relation between the expected value and the volatility of the nominal excess return on stocks. Journal of Finance, 48(5), 1779–1801.
  22. Huddart, S. Lang, M. Yetman, M. (2002). Psychological Factors, Stock Price Paths and Trading Volume, Working Paper, Pennsylvania State University.
  23. Investment company institute. (2023). http://www.ici.org
  24. Kallinterakis, V. & Kaur, S. (2010). On the impact of exchange traded funds over noise trading: Evidence from European stock exchanges. In G. N. Gregoriou (Ed.). Handbook of trading, 199–212, Europe: McGraw-Hill.
  25. Kallinterakis, V. Leite Ferreira, M. (2007). Herding and feedback trading: Evidence on their relationship at the macro level. SSRN Working Paper, No. 984681.
  26. Kallinterakis, V. Liu, F. Pantelous, A. & Shao, J. (2020). Pricing inefficiencies and feedback trading: Evidence from country ETFs. International Review of Financial Analysis, 70: 101498.
  27. King, T. & Koutmos, D. (2021), Herding and feedback trading in cryptocurrency markets. Annals of Operational Research, 300: 79–96.
  28. Koutmos, G. (1997). Feedback trading and the autocorrelation pattern of stock returns: further empirical evidence. Journal of Empirical Finance, 16, 625-636.
  29. Kyriakou, M. Babalos, V. Kiohos, A. & Koulakiotis, A. (2020), Feedback trading strategies and long-term volatility. Quarterly Review of Economics and Finance, 76, 171-179.
  30. Kyrkilis, D., Koulakiotis, A., Babalos, V. and Kyriakou, M. (2018), Feedback trading and short-term return dynamics in Athens Stock Exchange: Novel evidence and the role of size. International Journal of Managerial Finance, Vol. 14 No. 5, 574-590.
  31. Lakonishok, J. Shleifer, A. Vishny, R. (1992). The impact of institutional trading on stock prices. Journal of Financial Economics, 32, 23–43.
  32. Laopodis, N. (2005). Feedback trading and autocorrelation interactions in the foreign exchange market: Further evidence. Economic Modelling, 22, 811-827.
  33. Madura, J., & Richie, N. (2004). Overreaction of exchange-traded funds during the bubble of 1998-2002. Journal of Behavioral Finance, 5, 91–104.
  34. Malkiel, B. Fama, E. (1970). Efficient capital markets: A review of theory and empirical work. Journal of Finance, 25(2), 383-417.
  35. Odean, T. (1998). Are investors reluctant to realize their losses? Journal of finance, 53(5): 1775-1798.
  36. Saleem, M. Khan, M. (2013). The overview of Gold ETFs and its Various Positive Features. International Journal of Marketing, Financial Services and Management Research, 2, 125-135.
  37. Sentana, E., & Wadhwani, S. (1992). Feedback traders and stock return autocorrelations: Evidence from a century of daily data. Economic Journal, 102(411), 415–425.
  38. Shefrin, H. Statman, M. (1985). The Disposition to Sell Winners too Early and Ride Losers too Long. Journal of Finance, 40, 777-790.
  39. Shiller, R. (1984). Stock prices and social dynamics. Brookings Papers on Economic Activity, 1984 (2), 457-510.
  40. Souri, A. (2016). Advanced econometrics with the application of Eviews & Stata. Tehran: Farhangshani Publications. (in Persian)
  41. Tehran Securities Exchange Technology Management Co. (2023). http://www.tsetmc.com
  42. Tehran Stock Exchange. (2016). Pathology of exchange traded funds industry in Iran's capital market. (verified November 2016). (in Persian).
  43. Tehran Stock Exchange. (2018). Investigating the industry of exchange traded funds in reliable stock exchanges and the capital market of Iran. (verified August 2018). (in Persian).
  44. Wagner, M. Tek Lee, J. & Margaritis, D. (2022). Mutual fund flows and seasonalities in stock returns. Journal of Banking and Finance, 144, November 2022.