Cardinality-constrained Value at Risk based Portfolio Optimization Using Krill Herd Metaheuristic Algorithm (Case study: Tehran Stock Exchange)

Document Type : Original Article

Authors

1 Assistant Prof., Department of Industrial Engineering, Meybod University, Meybod, Iran

2 Assistant Prof., Department of Industrial Engineering, Meybod University, Meybod, Iran.

3 MSc. Student in financial Systems, Meybod University, Meybod, Iran.

4 MSc. Student in financial systems, Meybod University, Meybod, Iran.

Abstract

One of the most fundamental problems in investment decisions and portfolio optimization is choosing a suitable measure for risk assessment and management. In this study, the performance of the krill herd Algorithm is investigated for solving the mean-value at risk and mean-conditional value at risk portfolio optimization models considering the cardinality constraints, among 35 active companies in Tehran Stock Exchange. For algorithm training, the roller window method has been used in 2011-2018 and 2012-2019. The Sharpe ratio and the conditional Sharpe ratio of the models have been evaluated and they are compared using the Wilcoxon test. According to the numerical results, the mean–conditional value at risk model outperforms the mean–value at risk model in terms of the rate of return. Also, the model’s profitability improved using cardinality constraint with 5 stocks. Based on the empirical studies, we concluded that there is no significant difference between the performance of the value at risk and conditional value at risk based models. Furthermore, the portfolios with lower number of stocks have shown the better performance.

Keywords

References

  1. Afshar Kazemi, M., Shams, M., Kargar, M. (2014). Development of a new model for stock market portfolio optimization using Markowitz method and its correction by cosine model and its solution by genetic algorithm. Islamic Azad University, Central Tehran Branch, Financial Engineering and Securities Management. , 5(18), 81-104.(in pesrian)
  2. Agarwal, V., & Naik, N. Y. (2004). Risks and portfolio decisions involving hedge funds. The Review of Financial Studies, 17(1), 63-98.
  3. Angelelli, E., Mansini, R., & Speranza, M. G. (2008). A comparison of MAD and CVaR models with real features. Journal of Banking & Finance, 32(7), 1188-1197.
  4. Chang, T. J., Meade, N., Beasley, J. E., & Sharaiha, Y. M. (2000). Heuristics for cardinality constrained portfolio optimisation. Computers & Operations Research, 27(13), 1271-1302.
  5. Dowd, K. (2000). Adjusting for risk:: An improved Sharpe ratio. International review of economics & finance, 9(3), 209-222.
  6. Eslami Bidgoli, G., Vafi Sani, J., Alizadeh, M., Bajelan, S. (2009). Optimization and evaluation of the effect of diversity on portfolio performance using Ant Algorithm. Journal of Securities Exchange., 2(5), 57-75.(in pesrian)
  7. Ferreira, F. G., & Cardoso, R. T. (2021). Mean-CVaR Portfolio Optimization Approaches with Variable Cardinality Constraint and Rebalancing Process. Archives of Computational Methods in Engineering, 1-18.
  8. Gandomi, A. H., & Alavi, A. H. (2012). Krill herd: a new bio-inspired optimization algorithm. Communications in nonlinear science and numerical simulation, 17(12), 4831-4845.
  9. Ghanbari memeshi, E., nabavi chashmi, S., memarian, E. (2020). Value at Risk Assessment in Tehran Stock Exchange using Non-parametric and parametric Approaches. , 12(46), 252-272.(in pesrian)
  10. Ghasemi, H., Najafi, A. (2013). Portfolio Optimization in terms of Justifiability Short Selling and Some Market Practical Constraints. Financial Research Journal, 14(2), 117-132. doi: 10.22059/jfr.2013.51062.(in pesrian)
  11. Hanifi, F. (2001). Value at risk, A new approach to risk management. Capital(1).(in pesrian)
  12. Kalayci, C. B., Polat, O., & Akbay, M. A. (2020). An efficient hybrid metaheuristic algorithm for cardinality constrained portfolio optimization. Swarm and Evolutionary Computation, 54, 100662.
  13. Karimi, A. (2021). Stock portfolio optimization using multi-objective genetic algorithm (NSGA II) and maximum Sharp ratio. 12(46), 389-410.(in pesrian)
  14. Kaucic, M., Moradi, M., & Mirzazadeh, M. (2019). Portfolio optimization by improved NSGA-II and SPEA 2 based on different risk measures. Financial Innovation, 5(1), 1-28.
  15. Konno, H., & Yamazaki, H. (1991). Mean-absolute deviation portfolio optimization model and its applications to Tokyo stock market. Management science, 37(5), 519-531.
  16. Lwin, K. T., Qu, R., & MacCarthy, B. L. (2017). Mean-VaR portfolio optimization: A nonparametric approach. European Journal of Operational Research, 260(2), 751-766.
  17. Markowitz, H. (1952). Modern portfolio theory. Journal of Finance, 7(11), 77-91.
  18. Markowitz, H. M. (1959). Efficient diversification of investments. John Wiley and Sons, 12, 26-31.
  19. Mirabi, M., Zarei Mahmoudabadi, M. (2020). Optimization Portfolio Selection in Risk Situations with Combined Meta-Heuristic Algorithm of Genetic Algorithm (GA) and Lion Optimization Algorithm (LOA). Journal of Financial Management Perspective, 10(32), 33-56. doi: 10.52547/JFMP.10.32.33. (in pesrian)
  20. Moradi, M. (2017). Portfolio Optimization in Tehran Stock Exchange by Water Cycle Algorithm. Journal of Financial Management Perspective, 7(20), 9-32. (in pesrian)
  21. Mozaffari, M., Nikoomaram, H. (2020). Assessing the Efficiency of the Value-at-Risk Index (VAR) using Extreme Value Theory in comparison with traditional risk assessment methods. Financial Knowledge of Securities Analysis, 13(46), 179-191.(in pesrian)
  22. Neshatizade, L., Haidari, H. (2018). Studying of Volatility and Risk in Portfolio-Optimization Model Using of Imperialist Competitive Algorithm. Journal of Econometric Modelling, 3(4), 11-35. doi: 10.22075/jem.2019.14615.1162
  23. QASEMI, J., FARZAD, S. (2019). An Overview of the Application of Meta Heuristic Algorithms in Financial Field. Commercial Surveys, 17(96), 56-77. Qodosi, S., Tehrani, R., Bashiri, M. (2015). Portfolio optimization with simulated annealing algorithm. Financial Research Journal, 17(1), 141-158. doi: 10.22059/jfr.2015.52036.(in pesrian)
  24. Rockafellar, R. T., & Uryasev, S. (2000). Optimization of conditional value-at-risk. Journal of risk, 2, 21-42.
  25. Setiawan, E. P. (2020, July). Comparing bio-inspired heuristic algorithm for the mean-CVaR portfolio optimization. In Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1581(01) , 012014.
  26. Shahriari, A., Daei- Karimzadeh, S., Behmanesh, R. (2021). Stock portfolio optimization in fireworks algorithm using risk value and comparison with Particle Swarm Optimization (PSO). Journal of Financial Management Perspective, 11(35), 9-37. doi: 10.52547/jfmp.11.35.9. (in pesrian)
  27. Shiri Ghehi, A., Didehkhani, H., Khalili Damghani, K., Saeedi, P. (2018). Developing a Fuzzy Multibjective Model for Multiperiod Portfolio Optimazation Considering Average Value at Risk. 9(35), 131-151.(in pesrian)
  28. Taghizadeh Yazdi, M., Fallahpour, S., Ahmadi Moghaddam, M. (2017). Portfolio selection by means of Meta-goal programming and extended lexicograph goal programming approaches. Financial Research Journal, 18(4), 591-612. doi: 10.22059/jfr.2017.62580.(in pesrian)
  29. Tehrani, R., Fallah Tafti, S., & Asefi, S. (2018). Portfolio optimization using krill herd metaheuristic algorithm considering different measures of risk in Tehran stock exchange. Financial research journal, 20(4), 409-426.
  30. Unni, A. C., & Ongsakul, W. (2020). Fuzzy-based novel risk and reward definition applied for optimal generation-mix estimation. Renewable Energy, 148, 665-673.
  31. Wang, G. G., Gandomi, A. H., & Alavi, A. H. (2014). An effective krill herd algorithm with migration operator in biogeography-based optimization. Applied Mathematical Modelling, 38(9-10), 2454-2462.
  32. Wang, G. G., Gandomi, A. H., Alavi, A. H., & Hao, G. S. (2014). Hybrid krill herd algorithm with differential evolution for global numerical optimization. Neural Computing and Applications, 25(2), 297-308.
  33. Wolpert, D. H., & Macready, W. G. (1997). No free lunch theorems for optimization. IEEE transactions on evolutionary computation, 1(1), 67-82.
Financial Management Perspective
Volume 12, Issue 39
September 2022
Pages 147-169

Files

Share

How to cite

Statistics