تحلیل رفتاری بازده سهام براساس مدل‌های قیمت‌گذاری دارایی‌ها در چارچوب نظریه چشم انداز: شواهدی از شرکت‌های پذیرفته شده در بورس اوراق بهادار تهران

نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی

نویسندگان

1 استادیار، گروه حسابداری، دانشگاه صنعتی شاهرود، شاهرود، ایران.

2 استادیار، گروه مدیریت، دانشگاه صنعتی شاهرود، شاهرود، ایران.

چکیده

بخش عمده تحقیقات دو دهه اخیر در حیطه مدل های ارزش گذاری دارایی ها، شناخت دقیق تر متغیرهای تاثیرگذار بر بازده سهام و در نهایت کاهش خطاها و توضیح بهتر بازده سهام در این مدل ها بوده است. از سوی دیگر طی سال های گذشته تحقیقات گسترده ای در خصوص مباحث مالی رفتاری در خصوص توضیح بازده سهام توسط ویژگی های روانشناختی و رفتاری سرمایه گذاران انجام گرفته است. در این راستا این پژوهش در پی تحلیل رفتاری بازده سهام براساس مدل های قیمت گذاری دارایی ها در چارچوب نظریه چشم انداز در شرکت-های پذیرفته شده در بورس اوراق بهادار تهران بوده است. این پژوهش با استفاده از نمونه ای شامل 120 شرکت پذیرفته شده در‌ بورس اوراق بهادار تهران در دوره زمانی سال های 1387 تا 1399 و با استفاده از رویکرد رگرسیونی فاما-مکبث انجام گرفته است. نتایج بدست آمده نشان می دهد که نظریه چشم انداز تاثیری معنادار بر توضیح بازده سهام در مدل‌‌های ارزش گذاری دارایی های سرمایه ای، مدل سه عاملی فاما و فرنچ و مدل پنچ عاملی فاما و فرنچ داشته است، به طوری که با ورود نظریه چشم انداز به این مدل ها، بازده توضیح داده نشده آنها به شکل معناداری کاسته شده است.

کلیدواژه‌ها


عنوان مقاله [English]

Behavioral Analysis of Stock Returns Based on Assets Pricing Models in the Framework of Prospect Theory: Evidence from Companies Listed on the Tehran Stock Exchange

نویسندگان [English]

  • Mohsen Lotfi 1
  • Abdolmajid Abdolbaghi ataabadi 2
1 Assistant Prof, Department of Accounting, Shahrood University of Technology, Shahrood, Iran.
2 Assistant Prof, Department of Management, Shahrood University of Technology, Shahrood, Iran.
چکیده [English]

The major part of the research of the last two decades in the field of assets pricing models has been to more accurately identify the variables affecting stock returns and ultimately reduce errors and better explain stock returns in these models. On the other hand, in recent years, extensive research has been conducted on behavioral finance issues to explain stock returns by the psychological and behavioral characteristics of investors. In this regard, this study seeks to analyze the behavior of stock returns based on assets pricing models in the framework of prospect theory in companies listed on the Tehran Stock Exchange. This study was conducted using a sample of 120 companies listed on the Tehran Stock Exchange in the period from 2009 to 2020 and using the Fama-Macbeth regression approach. The results show that prospect theory has a significant effect on explaining stock returns in capital asset pricing models and the three-factor model and the five-factor model of Fama and French, so that with the introduction of prospect theory to this model their unexplained returns have been significantly reduced

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

  • Prospect Theory
  • Fama–MacBeth Models
  • Stock Returns
  • Assets Pricing Models
  1. Ansari Samani, H., Farhadian, A., Faramarzi, Z. (2019). The Effect of the Mispricing on Stock Returns: An Application of the Five-Factor Model. ـJournal of Financial Management Perspective, 9(28), 117-142. doi: 10.52547/jfmp.9.28.117. (In Persian).
  2. Barberis, N., & Huang, M. (2008). Stocks as Lotteries: The Implications of Probability Weighting for Security Prices. American Economic Review, 98(5), 2066 –2100.
  3. Barberis, N., (2013). Thirty Years of Prospect Theory in Economics: A Review and Assessment. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 27(1), 173–196.
  4. Barberis, N., Mukherjee, A., & Wang B. (2016). Prospect Theory and Stock Returns: An Empirical Test. The Review of Financial Studies, 29(11), 3068-3107.
  5. Barzideh, F., Kaffash Panjeshahi, M., Shariatpanahi, S., & Taghavifard, M. (2016). Stock Pricing Model Based on Prospect Theory. Financial Research Journal, 18(1), 59-76. doi: 10.22059/jfr.2016.59620. (In Persian).
  6. Burton, E., & Shah, S. (2015). Behavioral Finance: Understanding the Social, Cognitive, and Economic Debates, wiley.
  7. Diez-Esteban, J. M., Garcia-Gomez, C.D., Lopez-Iturriaga, F.J. & Santamaria-Mariscal, M. (2017). Corporate Risk-Taking, Returns and the Nature of Major Shareholders: Evidence from Prospect Theory. Research in International Business and Finance, 42(3), 900-911.
  8. Ding, D., Charoenwong, CH., & Seetoh, R. (2004). Prospect Theory, Analyst Forecasts, and Stock Returns. Journal of Multinational Financial Management, 14 (4-5), 425-442.
  9. Duda, F., De Gennaro, H., & Schubert, R. (2006). Gender, financial risk, and probability weights. Theory and Decision, 60(2-3), 283-313.
  10. Eyvazlo, R., Hashemi, Y., Qorbani, A. (2020). Multi-Factor asset pricing model in Iranian Capital Market. ـJournal of Financial Management Perspective, 10(32), 9-32. doi: 10.52547/JFMP.10.32.9. (In Persian)
  11. Fama, E., & French, K. (1992). The cross-section of expected stock returns. Journal of Finance, 47(2), 427-465.
  12. Fama, E., & French, K. (1993). Common Risk Factor in the Returns on Stocks and Bonds. Journal of Finance, 33(6), 3-56.
  13. Fama, E., & French, K. (2015). A Five-Factor Asset Pricing Model. Journal of Financial Economics, 116(1), 1-22.
  14. Fama, E., & MacBeth, J. (1973). Risk, Return, and Equilibrium: Empirical Tests. Journal of Political Economy, 81(3), 607–636.
  15. Ghadimi, F., & Soroushyar, A. (2019). Explaining Stocks’ Return Based on Prospect Theory. Financial Knowledge of Securities Analysis, 12(44), 141-151. (In Persian)
  16. Gregoriou, A., Healy, J.V., & Le, H. (2019). Prospect Theory and Stock Returns: A Seven Factor Pricing Model. Journal of Business Research, 101(2), 315–322.
  17. Henderson, V. (2012). Prospect theory, Liquidation, and the Disposition Effect. Management Science, 58(2), 445-460.
  18. Hens, T., & Vlcek, M. (2011). Does prospect theory explain the disposition effect? Journal of Behavioral Finance, 12(3), 141-157.
  19. Kaffash Panjeshahi, M., & Barzideh, F. (2017). The effect of prior performance of investors on stock price based on Prospect theory. Journal of Investment Knowledge, 6(23), 39-54. (In Persian)
  20. Kahneman, D., & Tversky A. (1979). Prospect Theory: An Analysis of Decision under rise. Econometrica, 47(2), 263-291.
  21. Kahneman, D., & Tversky A. (1992). Advances in Prospect Theory, cumulative representation of uncertainty. Journal of risk and uncertantity, 5(1), 297- 323.
  22. Kimiyagari, A., Eslami Bidgoli, Gh., & Eskandari, M. (2007). Test of the Fama-French Three-Factor Model in Tehran Stock Exchange. Financial Research Journal, 9(23), 61-82. (In Persian)
  23. Knoll, M. (2010). The Role of Behavioral Economics and Behavioral Decision Making in Americans’ Retirement Savings Decisions. Social Security Bulletin, 70(4), 1-23.
  24. Mosleh Shirazi, A., Namazi, M., Mohammadi, A., & Rajabi, A. (2013). Prospect Theory and Modeling Industrial Manager Decision Making Pattern. Journal of Industrial Management Perspective, 3(2), 9-33. (In Persian)
  25. Pitcher, A. (2008). Investigation of a Behavioral Model for Financial Decision Making. A dissertation submitted for the degree of MSc Mathematical & Computational Finance, Magdalen College University of Oxford, 1-43.
  26. Saghafi, A., Farhadi, R., Taghavi Fard, M., & Barzideh, F. (2015). Forecasting Investors Trading Behavior: Evidence from Prospect Theory. Journal of Investment Knowledge, 4(15), 19-32. (In Persian)
  27. Simon, H. (1959). Theories of Decision-Making in Economics and Behavioral Science. American Economic Review, 49(3), 253- 283.
  28. Thanh, H. (2017). Explaining Anomalies in Australia with a Five-factor Asset Pricing Model. International Review of Finance, 54(2), 423-455.
  29. Yang, W., Han, B., & Sui, P. (2021). Prospect Theory and Mutual Fund Flows. Rotman School of Management, Working Paper, Available at https://ssrn.com/abstract=3867988.
  30. Zhang, J. (2022). The Influence of CEO's Prior Performance on Her Risk Taking: A Prospect Theory Perspective. Available at https://ssrn.com/abstract=4003267.