تأثیر ارزش‌گذاری نادرست بر بازده سهام؛ کاربردی از الگوی پنج عاملی

نوع مقاله : علمی - پژوهشی

نویسندگان

1 استادیار بخش اقتصاد، دانشگاه یزد، یزد، ایران.

2 استادیار گروه مدیریت، دانشگاه کاشان، اصفهان، ایران

3 کارشناسی ارشد اقتصاد، دانشگاه یزد، یزد، ایران.

چکیده

سرمایه گذاری مطمئن برای یک سرمایه گذار وابسته به این است که بداند افزایش قیمت رخ داده در هر سهم واقعی است یا حباب قیمتی باعث این رشد قیمت شده است. به منظور بررسی نقش و اثر حباب قیمتی بر بازده سهام داده­های ماهانه نمونه­ای شامل 276 شرکت از بازار بورس اوراق بهادار تهران برای دو دوره­ی رونق و رکود بازار در یک مدل پنج عاملی بکار گرفته شده است. تخمین الگوی تحلیلی نشان می­دهد که ارزشگذاری نادرست سهام در دوره­ی رونق در تمام پرتفوها اثر مثبت و معنادار بر بازده سهام دارد. اما در دوره­ی رکود تنها در پنج پرتفوی اثر مثبت و معنادار مشاهده شده است. این نتایج به این معناست که در دوره رکود ارزشگذاری نادرست سهام با بازدهی بالاتر در سهم مربوطه همراه نیست اما این رابطه در دوره رونق تقویت می­شود. همچنین ضریب عامل صرف ریسک بازار در دوره­ی رکود در پرتفوهای بزرگ مثبت و معنادار است ولی در دوره­ی رونق در پرتفوهای بزرگ معنادار بوده ولی علامت ثابتی را نشان نمی­دهد. عامل اندازه هم در دوره­ی رونق و هم در دوره­ی رکود در پرتفوهای بزرگ رابطه­ی منفی و معناداری با بازدهی سهام دارد. عامل مومنتوم در دوره­ی رکود در پرتفوهای بزرگ و ارزشی معنادار است ولی در هر دو دوره علامت ثابتی را نشان نمی­دهد این عامل در دوره­ی رونق در پرتفوهای بزرگ معنادار است.

کلیدواژه‌ها


عنوان مقاله [English]

The Effect of the Mispricing on Stock Returns: An Application of the Five-Factor Model

نویسندگان [English]

  • Habib Ansari Samani 1
  • Ali Farhadian 2
  • Zahra Faramarzi 3
1 Assistant Prof, Department of Economics, Yazd University, Yazd, Iran.
2 Assistant Prof, Department of Management, Kashan University, Isfahan, Iran
3 MSc. In Economics, Yazd University, Yazd, Iran.
چکیده [English]

     A safe investment for an investor depends on knowing if the price increase is real or the mispricing is causing the price to rise. In order to examine the role and effect of the mispricing on the return on stocks of monthly data, a sample of 276 companies from the Tehran Stock Exchange has been used for two periods of Boom and Substantiv in a five-factor model. Analysis of the analytical model shows that mispricing of stocks during the boom period in all portfolios has a positive and significant effect on stock returns, but during the recession, only five portfolios had a positive and significant effect. These results mean that in the recession period, incorrect valuation of stocks is not associated with higher returns on the relevant share, but this relationship is strengthened during the boom period. Also, the factor of market risk in the recession period in large portfolios is positive and significant, but in the boom period in large portfolios it is significant but does not show a fixed sign. The size factor has a negative and significant relationship with stock returns both in the boom period and in the recession period in large portfolios. In addition, the value factor in the recession period in large portfolios is a positive and significant value, but in the boom period it is only positive and significant in large portfolios. The momentum factor is significant in the recession period in large and valuable portfolios, but does not show a fixed sign in both periods. This factor is significant in the boom period in large portfolios.

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

  • Stock Mispricing
  • Stockreturns
  • Tehran Stock Exchange
  • Financial Economy
  • Factor Models
  1. Abbasi, Gholamreza., Mohammadi Mohammadi, H. Neshat Avar, MA. (2019). Investigating the role of price bubble in creating fluctuations in Tehran Stock Exchange (selected companies of petrochemical and automotive industries), Quarterly Journal of Financial Economics , No. 43. (In Persion).
  2. Ahmed, A., Safdar, I. (2018). Dissecting stock price momentum using financial
  3. statement analysis. Journal of Accounting and Finance, 58(S1), 3-43.
  4. Aloui, M., & Jarboui, A. (2018). The effects of corporate governance on the stock return volatility: During the financial crisis. International Journal of Law and Management, 60(2), 478-495.
  5. Alzahrani, Mohammed, & Rao, Ramesh p. (2014). Managerial Behavior and the Link between Stock Mispricing and Corporate Investments: Evidence from Market-to-Book Ratio Decomposition. The Financial Review, 89–116.
  6. Anderson, Keith, & Brooks, Chris. (2014). Speculative bubbles and the cross-sectional variation in stock returns. International Review of Financial Analysis, 20-31.
  7. Ansari Samani, Habib., Nazari, Farhan. (2017). Identifying and ranking the factors that predict the stock price bubble: the application of logistic regression and Artificial neural network. Previous Economic Reviews, Vol. 13, No. 4, pp. 102-75). (In Persion).
  8. Boamah, Nicholas Addai, Watts, Edward, & Loudon, Geoffrey. (2017). Regionally Integrated Asset Pricing on the African Stock Markets: Evidence from the Fama French and Carhart Models. Journal of Economics and Business.
  9. C. Wang, P.-Y. Nie. (2018), “A note on effects of rational bubble on portfolios”,journal of Physica A, 492, 50-56.
  10. Carhart, Mark M. (1997). On persistence in mutual fund perfoemance. finance, 52, 57-82.
  11. Case, K. E., & Shiller, R. J. (1988). The behavior of home buyers in boom and post-boom markets.
  12. Chen, j.j., Hwang, H. (2019). Business cycle, expected return and momentum
  13. payoffs. Journal of Finance Research Letters, 29, 83-89.
  14. Chi, J. and Gupta, M. (2009). Overvaluation and earning management, Journal of Banking and Finance, Vol. 33, No 9, pp. 1652-1663.
  15. Costa, C. T., da Silva, W. V., de Almeida, L. B., & da Veiga, C. P. (2017). Empirical evidence of the existence of speculative bubbles in the prices of stocks traded on the São Paulo Stock Exchange. Contaduria y administracion, 62(4), 1317-1334.
  16. Fama, E. F., & French, K. R. (2012). Size, value, and momentum in international stock returns. Journal of Financial Economics, 105, 457-472.
  17. Fama, E., French, k. (2006), " Profitability, Investment and average returns", Journal of Financial Economic 80, 491-518.
  18. Fama, E.F., French, K.R., 2015. A five-factor asset pricing model. J. Financ. Econ. 116, 1–22.
  19. Fama, Eugene F., & French, Kenneth R. (1993). Common risk factors in the returns on stocks and bonds. Financial Economics, 3-56.
  20. Fama, Eugene F., & French, Kenneth R. (1996). Multifactor Expanations Of Asset Prising Anomalies. finance, 55-84.
  21. Fama, Eugene F., & French, Kenneth R. (2004). The Capital Asset Pricing Model: Theory and Evidence. Economic Perspectives.
  22. Farhadi, RA., Akhondi, A., Mehr Avar, HR. (2020). Explaining the relationship between collective and momentum behavior and stock returns: Evidence from the Iranian capital market, Journal of Financial Management Perspectives, No. 26, pp. 121-145. (In Persion).
  23. Garber, P. M. (2000). Famous first bubbles: The fundamentals of early manias. New York: MIT Press.
  24. Gol Arzi, Gh., Danayi, K., (2020). Investigating the overreaction of shareholders and comparing it in small and large companies in the Tehran Stock Exchange, Journal of Financial Management Perspectives, No. 25, pp. 59-76. (In Persion).
  25. Gomez-Gonzalez, J.E., J.N. Ojeda-Joya, C. Rey-Guerra & N. Sicard. (2013). Testing for Bubbles in Housing Markets: New Results Using a New Method. Federal Reserve Bank of Dallas, Working Paper, No. 164.
  26. Gourieroux, C., Jasiak, J., & Monfort, A. (2016). Stationary bubble equilibria in rational expectation models. CRESTWorking Paper. Paris, France: Centre de Recherche en Economie et Statistique.[Google Scholar].
  27. HafezNiya, MR., PourTaheri, M., Rabie, H. (2008). The Role of Spatial Differences in Citizens' Attitudes Towards Religious Government Legitimacy, Case Study: Tehran, Geopolitical Quarterly, Vol. 4, No. 2. (In Persion).
  28. Hajian Nezhad, A., Salavati, AH. (2019). Analysis of the effect of momentum on size in companies listed on the Tehran Stock Exchange, Fourth National Conference on Management, Accounting and Economics with Emphasis on Regional and Global Marketing, Tehran - Shahid Beheshti University, Permanent Secretariat of the Conference. (In Persion).
  29. Hirigoyen, Gerard, & Poelain-Rehm, Thierry. (2014). Relationships between Corporate Social Responsibility and financial performance: What is the Causality.
  30. Isavi, M., Tari, FA., Ansari Samani, H., AmouZad Khalili, H. (2019). Investigating the functional appropriateness of capital ratios in Iranian banks, Journal of Financial Management Perspectives, No. 21, pp. 95-113. (In Persion).
  31. Ja’fari Samimi, A., BalouNezhad Nouri, R. (2016). Multiple Price Bubbles Test: Application of General Dicky-Fuller General Superimum Method, Quarterly Journal of Economic Modeling Research, No. 21. (In Persion).
  32. Jones, Howard and Jose V. Martinez, (2013), “How Institutional Investors Form and Ignore Their Own Expectations, working paper, Saïd Business School, University of Oxford (September 29).
  33. Komaromi, G. (2004). Was There a Stock Market Bubble in Hungary? Competitio, 3(1): 169-178.
  34. Luo, Y. and Zhang, Ch. (2020), “Economic policy uncertainty and stock price crash risk”, Research in International Business and Finance, 51, 101-112.
  35. Markowitz, H. (1952). The utility of wealth. Journal of political Economy, 60(2), 151-158.
  36. Merton, R. C. (1973). Theory of rational option pricing. Theory of Valuation, 229-288.
  37. Mozumder, N., De Vita, G., Kyaw, S., & Larkin, C. (2015). Volatility spillover between stock prices and exchange rates: New evidence across the recent financial crisis period.
  38. Norouzi, M., Taghi Pouriani Gilani, Y., Faraji, J. (2018). The role of institutional shareholders in adjusting the relationship between incorrect stock pricing and corporate investment, Journal of Accounting and Management Perspective, Vol. 1, No. 3. (In Persion).
  39. Omay, T., & Iren, P. (2019). Behavior of foreign investors in the Malaysian stock market in times of crisis: A nonlinear approach. Journal of Asian Economics, 60, 85-100.
  40. Schroth, J. (2018). Managerial Compensation and Stock Price Manipulation. Journal of Accounting Research, 56(5), 1335-1381.
  41. Schwert, G. W. (2011). Stock volatility during the recent financial crisis. European Financial Management, 17(5), 789-805.
  42. Sehgal, F. and Jain, S. (2011), "Short Term Momentum Patterns in Stock and Sectoral Returns", journal of advances in management research, 8(1), 99-122.
  43. Sharpe, W. F. (1964). Capital asset prices: A theory of market equilibrium under conditions of risk. The journal of finance, 19(3), 425-442.
  44. Tsai, C. L. (2015). How do US stock returns respond differently to oil price shocks pre-crisis, within the financial crisis, and post-crisis?. Energy Economics, 50, 47-62.
  45. Walkshäusl, Christian. (2016). Mispricing and the five-factor model. Economics Letters, 99-102.
  46. Wang, Z., Yang, J., & Bessler, D. A. (2003). Financial crisis and African stock market integration. Applied Economics Letters, 10(9), 527-533.
  47. Williams, J. B. (1938). The Theory of Investment Value, by John Burr Williams. Mass..